AN ASSESSMENT OF THE THE PRESENT JUDICIARY SYSTEM OF NIGERIA IN DECIDING ELECTION CASES
- Project Research
- 1-5 Chapters
- Quantitative
- Content
- Abstract : Available
- Table of Content: Available
- Reference Style: APA
- Recommended for :
- NGN 3000
Background of the study
The judiciary, among these organs, is an indispensable organ that balances the exercise of powers in the polity of any nation. 2The general responsibility of the court in the adjudication of an election is to hear and determine the winner and, consequently, the loser whenever a petition comes up for trial.
However, in the Fourth Republic, just as in the other civilian interregnums before it, there was hardly any state in Nigeria where one election or the other was not annulled and bye-elections were held. Since the 1999 elections, courts at various levels have throughout the country voided the victories of a couple of governors, scores of senators (including a sitting Senate President) and numerous federal and state legislators, as well as local government chairmen and councilors.
Election disputes are highly sensitive and controversial, so much so that the process of disposing of them seems as if the judiciary itself is on trial. Indeed, according to Okoye (2009), the debate on the role and place of the judiciary in electoral disputes revolves around the question of whether "they should give voice to the choices of the people without bowing and being slavish to the technicalities of the law and the constitution." It is, on the other hand, whether the judiciary is properly positioned to substitute its own will and decisions for those of the Nigerian people without being accused of judicial tyranny.
Nigeria has a reputation for "muddled elections," "criminal politics," and "garrison democracy."Since the democratic transition in 1999, all the elections held in the country – in 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011 – have been accompanied by reports of widespread electoral fraud. After the 1999 elections, for instance, the Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) – a coalition of local civil society groups – reported that ‘the trend of awarding high votes, or votes in excess of the number of accredited voters, which had been observed during the National Assembly elections, assumed much greater proportions during the Presidential elections’ (TMG 1999).
After the 2003 elections, the European Union Election Observation Mission (EUEOM) reported that, in a number of states, the conduct of the elections did not comply with Nigerian law and international standards. Several parties, mostly established ones, were identified as being involved in malpractice' (EUEOM 2003).The outcome of the 2007 general elections was considered more fraudulent than the previous ones and, indeed, the worst in the contemporary electoral history of Nigeria. These and many instances, both at state and local level, have led to the questioning of the integrity of the judiciary in upholding democratic principles rather than allowing themselves to be used to oppose the voice of the people.
Statement of the problem
The Nigerian judiciary has often come under severe criticism for its handling or mishandling of election petition cases. In particular, judges have been accused of deliberate tardiness leading to unnecessary delays, conspiracy to frustrate litigants, corruption (including allegedly selling judgments to the highest bidder), undue politicization of the cases and a downright travesty of justice, etc.
Prior to this time, electoral fraud was characterized by pre-election rigging, polling-day rigging and post-election rigging methods as forms and stages of electoral fraud in the country, appearing to be outstanding. Other common forms of electoral fraud include multiple and false registration, vote-buying, underage voting, multiple voting, voter intimidation, ballot stealing and snatching, false declaration of winners and others, at different stages of the electoral process before, during and after elections. These popular forms of electoral fraud have been increasing claims in several circles, especially among the political elite and public analysts, that there is indeed a new and sophisticated dimension to electoral fraud in Nigeria. This is the manipulation of the judicial process to produce false winners. These claims are also related to the recent internal wrangling in the hierarchy of the Nigerian judiciary over claims and accusations of fraudulent court rulings in disputed elections.
Hence, a substantial number of Nigerians have questioned the role of the judiciary as a true arbiter in electoral matters. There are many pitfalls and controversies associated with election petitions particularly the role of judges - which, individually and collectively, have made it such an agonizing, frustrating and often fruitless exercise for both petitioners and the democratic enterprise. The election petition, ironically, seeks to open a window of justice for the former while upholding and strengthening the latter.Thus, it is against this backdrop that this study seeks to present an assessment of the present judiciary system of Nigeria in deciding election cases.
1.3 Objective of the study
The primary goal of this research is to improve the evaluation of Nigeria's current judicial system's decisions.Specifically, the study seeks to:
- To investigate the nature of election preparation,
- To investigate the role of the judiciary in dispute resolution in Nigeria's nascent democracy.
- To present cases of judiciary adjudication of election cases in the fourth republic.
1.4 Research Questions
The research is guided by the following questions.
- What is the nature of Nigeria's electoral process?
- What role does the judiciary play in resolving disputes in Nigeria's New Nascent Democracy?
- Are there cases of judiciary adjudication of election cases and mishandling of election cases in Nigeria's fourth republic?
Related Project Materials
INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION IN BUILDING ETHICAL BEHAVIOR
ABSTRACT: This study Investigated the Role of Early Childhood Education in Building Ethical...
INEC AND CHALLENGES OF MONITORING POLITICAL PARTY CAMPAIGN FINANCING IN NIGERIA
Abstract
Democracy is a system in which the government is controlled by the people, and in which people are considered equals in the exer...
THE IMPACT OF MARKET SEGMENTATION ON SALES STRATEGIES
THE IMPACT OF MARKET SEGMENTATION ON SALES STRATEGIES
This study examines the impact o...
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE VARIABLES CONTRIBUTING TO WOMEN’S EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION IN ADULT EDUCATION IN NIGERIA
Background of the study
The central tenet of the Nigerian educational system is the development of the whole person into...
INVESTIGATING THE CAUSES, EFFECTS AND SOLUTION STRATEGIES OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
ABSTRACT
Antisocial behaviors are often exhibited by secondary school students because majority of...
AN ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY REGIMES FOR THE TAXATION OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN NIGERIA
ABSTRACT
No doubt, the advent of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has greatly impacted human interaction ranging from polit...
THE EFFECT OF PARENTS BEHAVIOUR ON THE DISCIPLINARY ATTITUDE OF PRIMARY SCHOOL PUPIL. (CASE STUDY OF OWAN EAST LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA AFUZE EDO STATE)
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Presently, the rate of misbehaviour among pupils is a...
A STUDY ON LANGUAGE BARRIERS IN VOCATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAMS
ABSTRACT: A study on Language Barriers in Vocational Training Programs investigates strategies to overcome linguistic challenges faced by non-nativ...
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN THE NIGERIAN PRISON SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF NIGER STATE PRISON
ABSTRACT
Prisoners in Nigeria are often perceived and categorized as “outcast”. The belief of many is that, once you are a pr...
THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL POLICIES IN ACHIEVING BUSINESS OBJECTIVES
Abstract: THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL POLICIES IN ACHIEVING BUSINESS OBJECTIVES
This study i...
